Closed cdeil closed 7 years ago
I would remove the last sentence that some images are currently fetched from 3FGL-table. That was just a temp solution to have something to show in the group meeting, and it's not live at gamma-sky.net.
They don't even have 2FHL plots there, we'll just write a script to make both 2FHL and 3FGL plots for gamma-sky.net and serve the PNGs ourselves. (see https://gammapy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/spectrum/plotting_fermi_spectra.html)
It'll also be good to have this single-sentence paragraph on the next page gone for paper structure.
I do think we should link to "3FGL-table" somewhere, like we do from https://github.com/gammapy/gamma-sky/wiki/Other-projects In the paper this could either be in the intro, in a section mentioning "other projects" like 3FGL-table or WWT or Google Sky or TeVCat and why we still decided to do a new webpage. Or you could mention "3FGL-table" in the outlook section when discussing features we want to add, e.g. selecting sub-classes of sources like "SNR" or "Galactic" or "blazar" or "UN-ID".
See fixes here.
We mention that the SNRcat database is maintained by Gilles and Samar - should we say the same for gamma-cat, that you maintain it? Or did you want me to remove this "database is maintained by..." sentence altogether?
I didn't make an "other projects" paragraph in the Intro like you suggested. I'll open an issue in case you still want to do so.
Thanks for implementing all the suggestions.
We mention that the SNRcat database is maintained by Gilles and Samar - should we say the same for gamma-cat, that you maintain it? Or did you want me to remove this "database is maintained by..." sentence altogether?
Keep as-is now, or remove the sentence who maintains it. I just found it weird to say that the university of Manitoba maintains it.
No need to mention who maintains gamma-cat.