@robertazanin - I've written a little script and put a masked version of RX J1713 in 2bdf5c7aa83c15a30e8d3f2188fc1c081e83657a .
Can you please finalise the list of sources with images and make masked versions where needed?
Talking to Jürgen and Stefan this morning, they didn't seem to care much if cases like W28 are put as an image, leaning towards "no" if the image is bad (i.e. noisy or has extra diffuse emission).
My suggestion would be the same: drop any cases that require you to spend extra time to clean up images or make new images.
As long as there is one or two image-based sources that can be used for testing science tools, then it's fine.
cdeil
commented
7 years ago
@robertazanin - I've written a little script and put a masked version of RX J1713 in 2bdf5c7aa83c15a30e8d3f2188fc1c081e83657a .
Can you please finalise the list of sources with images and make masked versions where needed?
Talking to Jürgen and Stefan this morning, they didn't seem to care much if cases like W28 are put as an image, leaning towards "no" if the image is bad (i.e. noisy or has extra diffuse emission).
My suggestion would be the same: drop any cases that require you to spend extra time to clean up images or make new images.
As long as there is one or two image-based sources that can be used for testing science tools, then it's fine.