Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Thank you for the feedback. We have filed a bug in our tracking system for
this, and will work on fixing it.
Original comment by vil...@google.com
on 25 Nov 2014 at 4:14
I have runned into this to. I then used the webinterface to import the same
image. It said nothing about it went wrong but still not a working image. The
image shows up in the list of images, in the same way as failed command line.
The userinterface needs to be more clear when things fails.
Original comment by ma...@spotify.com
on 28 Nov 2014 at 7:37
This happens now even with small disks (10GB) 1-2 times out of 10.
Original comment by siv...@inaccess.com
on 12 Dec 2014 at 8:33
[deleted comment]
I am facing this issue consistantly with disk of size 200 GB...
Its very irritating. Is there any temporary workaround for this??
Original comment by tahir.ra...@gmail.com
on 23 Dec 2014 at 9:12
Hi Tahir,
The next release of gcloud will have a longer timeout, and in the future this
will be more configurable.
The error message is unclear. This is gcloud locally *assuming* that the
command failed because it took a long time, but it still (most likely) did
succeed on the server. The short term work around is to wait a bit longer and
to check that your snapshot was in fact created. You can check this with
`gcloud compute snapshots list` or through the web console at
https://console.developers.google.com/.
Sorry about the trouble!
Original comment by jeffvaug...@google.com
on 23 Dec 2014 at 5:19
@Google, please give this issue some priority, it may lead to data loss for a
lot of people, since errors can go undetected; catching the status afterwards
with polling is unreliable without predefined error conditions. We have also
raised this through our support channel a long time ago.
Original comment by siv...@inaccess.com
on 24 Dec 2014 at 8:48
Original comment by rdayal@google.com
on 26 Dec 2014 at 6:19
@sivann: can you please comment on possible data loss scenarios? I haven't
seen evidence of this, and would like to better understand how this could occur.
Also, the next release of gcloud will, in addition to the longer time out, have
a more clear message explaining how to check-up on resources that should be
created (etc.) by pending operations. We are also planning to work on
providing a better and more consistent handling of timeouts across gcloud.
Original comment by jeffvaug...@google.com
on 29 Dec 2014 at 7:54
Since we now ignore errors from snapshots, data loss can occur if the snapshots
actually fail to execute and this will go unnoticed. If we actually need to
restore data from a non-existing snapshot, we won't be able to.
Inter-region Snapshots are the single most important advantage of cloud
services (for both gce and aws) and they should work flawlessly.
I'm reluctant to trust the snapshotting mechanism right now since there is no official method to check for successful completion.
We would prefer a blocking "create snapshot" call, than scripting a complicated
mechanism of polling. We'll sleep better :-)
Alternatively google could create a web-interface to schedule snapshots and
report back on errors.
Kind Regards,
-Spiros
Original comment by siv...@inaccess.com
on 31 Dec 2014 at 9:35
Any updates on this?
Original comment by siv...@inaccess.com
on 24 Feb 2015 at 10:42
I just ran into this while trying to snapshot a 500GB SSD Persistent Disk.
ERROR: (gcloud.compute.disks.snapshot) Some requests did not succeed:
- Did not createSnapshot the following resources within 660s: https://www.googleapis.com/compute/v1/projects/<proj_name>/zones/us-central1-f/disks/highmem8-1-aggr0. These operations may still be underway remotely and may still succeed; use gcloud list and describe commands or https://console.developers.google.com/ to check resource state
1 hour later and the snapshot is still showing as failed:
<...>@temp-sdk:~$ gcloud compute snapshots list highmem8-1-aggr0-snapshot
NAME DISK_SIZE_GB SRC_DISK
STATUS
highmem8-1-aggr0-snapshot 0 us-central1-f/disks/highmem8-1-aggr0
FAILED
I tried a similar snapshot against a 200GB volume and it completed in less than
5 minutes.
Seems like this is still a problem.
Original comment by b...@averesystems.com
on 5 Aug 2015 at 7:25
#12: did you try the same snapshot again? FAILED suggests to me that the
snapshot actually failed, and didn't just timeout.
We're going to bump the timeouts substantially within (likely) the next two
releases, and will also add an override flag. (It looks like disk sizes keep
growing.)
In the meantime, please use the web console for snapshots, or one of the
strategies suggested in #6.
Original comment by z...@google.com
on 6 Aug 2015 at 3:21
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
siv...@inaccess.com
on 17 Nov 2014 at 8:04