ganesansays / build-pipeline-plugin

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/build-pipeline-plugin
0 stars 0 forks source link

Configure the display of project configuration and parallel downstream jobs in build pipeline view #119

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
The latest build pipeline plug-in release removes Project configuration from 
the top, only pipeline build histories are displayed. And the parallel 
downstream jobs are displayed in different rows. 
But the view display in the first release 1.0.0, as shown in picture, is 
clearer to see. 
Is it possible to provide the following options for view display in your 
following releases?
1.  Whether need to display project configuration
2.  Whether need to display parallel downstream jobs in different rows

Thank you very much!

Original issue reported on code.google.com by huangd...@yahoo.com.cn on 24 Jul 2012 at 10:03

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
The current of the build pipeline plugin lets you show or hide the header row.  
If you click on configure, you should be able to see a 'Show pipeline 
definition header' option.
What do you mean by 'Whether need to display parallel downstream jobs in 
different rows'?

Original comment by marc...@centrumsystems.com.au on 25 Jul 2012 at 4:17

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Hi, thank you for your answer. The header can be shown now. Thank you!

Here is the explanation of the second option: Whether need to display parallel 
downstream jobs in different rows

For example, if project A has downstream projects B, C, D. And B, C, D will be 
executed in parallel. In current view, B, C, D will be shown in different rows, 
as 
A->B
   ->C
   ->D

But if we have several build histories, the view will expand long in vertical 
direction, which is not clear. If we could configure to display parallel 
downstream projects in the same rows, the view can be shown as A->B->C->D. It 
makes the view more clear. How do you think?

Do you have such a plan to realize the second option? Thank you!

Original comment by huangd...@yahoo.com.cn on 27 Jul 2012 at 3:22