Closed valentinwust closed 1 year ago
Hi @valentinwust! Yes that's the identical setup as the competition git.
Thank you, then I'll probably just use that. That being said, this uses scclue 0.1.1, and I've noticed some slight changes in the code of CLUE since then. Do they meaningfully affect the preformance?
Actually that was not 0.1.1, but a version between 0.1.1 and 0.2.0. We didn't tag it as a dedicated public release. To exactly reproduce the CLUE model in the competition, I'd suggest using the whl file in the competition repo to install scglue
. Apologies for the inconvenience.
No problem, this is indeed what I am currently doing. I was just wondering whether the current release (0.3.2) would perform better or similar, if it has a relevant performance increase it might make sense to use the most current version instead.
Great! There shouldn't be a noticeable performance difference. You may just use the whl version to avoid needing to change some of the function calls due to API changes along the way.
Thanks, then I'll do that.
In the supplementary material to the CLUE paper, you mention a .zip file with all the relevant code; however I can't find this anywhere. Did you use the exact same setup as published on the competition git? I'm trying to run some benchmarks and want to stay as close to your paper as possible.
Greetings Valentin