Open 23matin opened 5 years ago
i have the same question with you, can anybody help?
Uhhhh,seems something different I will check it later
Uhhhh,seems something different I will check it later
I also observed some difference between my results and the results posted on Github. For A3 data, I always got the following results no matter how fast I played the rosbag.
type: IMU name: A3 Gyr: unit: " rad/s" avg-axis: gyr_n: 2.1351484255583693e-03 gyr_w: 3.0118327235660890e-05 x-axis: gyr_n: 2.2761455758382055e-03 gyr_w: 3.5807139355605253e-05 y-axis: gyr_n: 2.1481099566996453e-03 gyr_w: 3.1987662852364106e-05 z-axis: gyr_n: 1.9811897441372574e-03 gyr_w: 2.2560179499013303e-05 Acc: unit: " m/s^2" avg-axis: acc_n: 2.7433396928041465e-02 acc_w: 6.0511514459808539e-04 x-axis: acc_n: 2.2944432766196329e-02 acc_w: 5.3089385840146867e-04 y-axis: acc_n: 2.4074942631450987e-02 acc_w: 6.0364353027662736e-04 z-axis: acc_n: 3.5280815386477080e-02 acc_w: 6.8080804511616024e-04
type: IMU name: A3 Gyr: unit: " rad/s" avg-axis: gyr_n: 2.1368945822378715e-03 gyr_w: 3.0200858616831391e-05 x-axis: gyr_n: 2.2850607115752581e-03 gyr_w: 3.5888806047445071e-05 y-axis: gyr_n: 2.1437755224791373e-03 gyr_w: 3.2187208542462374e-05 z-axis: gyr_n: 1.9818475126592186e-03 gyr_w: 2.2526561260586737e-05 Acc: unit: " m/s^2" avg-axis: acc_n: 2.7615339617476531e-02 acc_w: 6.3638852544213207e-04 x-axis: acc_n: 2.3509501859500022e-02 acc_w: 5.3422099556560550e-04 y-axis: acc_n: 2.3564766827602595e-02 acc_w: 6.0043815190390657e-04 z-axis: acc_n: 3.5771750165326979e-02 acc_w: 7.7450642885688447e-04
My result is also different from that given.Here's what I got
type: IMU name: "A3" Gyr: unit: " rad/s" avg-axis: gyr_n: 2.1267737833765769e-03 gyr_w: 3.0020942712407391e-05 x-axis: gyr_n: 2.2545903384908663e-03 gyr_w: 3.4578244608146821e-05 y-axis: gyr_n: 2.1446706374840321e-03 gyr_w: 3.2559043638179981e-05 z-axis: gyr_n: 1.9810603741548327e-03 gyr_w: 2.2925539890895362e-05 Acc: unit: " m/s^2" avg-axis: acc_n: 2.7277780651013772e-02 acc_w: 6.4735219294483461e-04 x-axis: acc_n: 2.2893552216220955e-02 acc_w: 5.2617622561120197e-04 y-axis: acc_n: 2.2754690562618862e-02 acc_w: 6.0703818233019756e-04 z-axis: acc_n: 3.6185099174201506e-02 acc_w: 8.0884217089310429e-04
I have the same result. But I think the reason is that the IMU is not flat.
---
header:
seq: 245185
stamp:
secs: 1518107778
nsecs: 380825295
frame_id: "FLU"
orientation:
x: -0.0107081532954
y: -0.588978761633
z: -0.000865663655542
w: 0.808077142277
orientation_covariance: [0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0]
angular_velocity:
x: -0.00176756794099
y: -0.00166124606039
z: 0.000752829015255
angular_velocity_covariance: [0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0]
linear_acceleration:
x: 9.2817324084
y: -0.159711141288
z: 2.98692894071
linear_acceleration_covariance: [0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0]
---
Hi Wenliang Gao, I run your code with the the default launch file and the bagfiles on the Baidu Netdisk,but I got different results with your results. Especially the gyr_n and acc_n. Could you please help me explain why? Thanks!! Here are some results I got :