Closed markuspf closed 6 years ago
I think you can simply replace it by READ_COMMAND_REAL -- after all, these two functions only differ in their return values, and the zmq code ignores the return value.
READ_COMMAND_REAL
Resovled in dc5e7a985a4dc40b79734b5350cdb711413c0839 (and released in 0.7)
I think you can simply replace it by
READ_COMMAND_REAL
-- after all, these two functions only differ in their return values, and the zmq code ignores the return value.