Closed jengelh closed 2 years ago
The ANUPQ 3.2 release is still missing a suitable declaration.
I would also like to know what license this code is distributed under.
+1
I've emailed Eamon O'Brien to resolve this
After discussions with Greg Gamble, Werner Nickel, and Eamon O'Brien, it was agreed to license anupq under the Artistic License 2.0. See PR #58
Thank you for handling this @fingolfin .
The package does not have a declaration of what license applies. Just the name would be enough for my needs, but even that is missing. This makes it impossible to distribute with Linux distributions. Methods that were tried to find any declaration: locate a file whose name matches /copying/i, locate a file whose name matches /license/, locate a file /readme/ which mentions the word /license/i, locate any non-autogenerated file containing the words /gnu.general/i or /warranty/i.