Closed ChrisJefferson closed 5 years ago
I am not convinced that the io.c from this package is the problem with the GAP coverage. The "bad" coverage reported by Codecov reports lines as code which are code neither in GAP's nor in IO's io.c
.
Some of the mess was made by io.c
in external software such as gmp
, which we don't control.
We don't need this change, things work fine now thanks to the proper fix by @markuspf
Several code coverage systems seem to confuse src/io.c in GAP with src/io.c in the IO package, so rename io.c in the IO package.
While this does seem a bit of an excessive fix, on the other hand it should be (hopefully!) the easiest way to improve coverage measurement.