Closed ssiccha closed 3 years ago
It would be good to find out (e.g. by asking Eamonn) what the provenance of RecognizeSporadic
is -- is there e.g. a paper reference? And what are the assumptions this function makes exactly? From a glance at it, I'd guess that it assumes that one already ruled out (probabilistically at least) that the group is alternativ, symmetric etc. Correct?
Also, it's not clear to me how the Magma code deals with Schur covers of the sporadic groups? It seems to me that RecognizeSporadic
assumes there is no center? I may be misunderstanding here something, though?
I've asked Eamonn. Let's see. :)
See the discussion in #195. Implementing the
RecognizeSporadic
function from magma is straight-forward. In magma it is called with the orders of at least 500 random group elements. So it might be a little bit slower thenSporadicsByOrders
which we currently use and which uses about 120 random elements. If the magma function turns out to be a lot more accurate though, we could get rid ofSporadicsByOrders
.