Closed olado closed 12 years ago
Thanks for the PR, and I'm sorry about the lack of clarity. I need to find a better way of stating some of these things. I'll change doT to logicful, but the formatting thing is meant to indicate whether you write the template in a language other than HTML. Going to close the PR and try to find a better way of expressing that..
Thanks. Additional criteria that might be good to add: 1) Size of the engine 2) Does the code in the compiled function have dependencies on the engine - useful when you want to produce and ship compiled templates vs the text. 3) Is it HTML specific or can it be used on any kind of text.
------Original Message------ From: Garann Means To: Laura Doktorova Subject: Re: [template-chooser] Added logicfull and not-format to doT.js (#6) Sent: Apr 30, 2012 6:45 PM
Thanks for the PR, and I'm sorry about the lack of clarity. I need to find a better way of stating some of these things. I'll change doT to logicful, but the formatting thing is meant to indicate whether you write the template in a language other than HTML. Going to close the PR and try to find a better way of expressing that..
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/garann/template-chooser/pull/6#issuecomment-5429724
I added logicfull (as JS is allowed) and not-format as doT has an option to preserve original formatting or strip whitespaces. doT.js is flexible.