search

garrelt / C2-Ray3Dm

The 3D version of C2-Ray for multiple sources, hydrogen only
http://ttt.astro.su.se/~garrelt/C2-Ray3Dm/
20 stars 5 forks source link

Status of repo? #1

Closed will-henney closed 1 year ago

will-henney commented 13 years ago

Hi Garrelt

A few questions:

Is this now the canonical version of C2Ray?

Is this repo public, or are you paying github to let you have private repos?

If it is public, then does that mean you would be ok with me putting Phab-C2 on github? Currently only the input scripts and the post-processing suite are here. The code itself is on my own git server, only accessible from inside the CRyA firewall.

Cheers

Will

PS. The real motive for writing this was to try out the new Github Issues app for iOS.

garrelt commented 13 years ago

Hi Will,

Well, I decided to put C2-Ray on github so as to have a more modern rcs and to more easily give collaborators access to C2-Ray. At the moment it is public, but without proper documentation, I think this does not mean much. I am pretty sure that Paul would object to it being public, but from previous experience I must say that even those whom we help have quite some difficulties getting going with the code, so those who just get a copy will be pretty much lost (or if they are smart enough to figure everything out, they will have probably written their own code).

I may in the future start paying, or possibly we could use the CITA github account for this (the N-body code we are using CubeP3M will be there).

For my part it is ok to put Phab-C2 on github public too, for the same reasons. I do not think that people will find it easy to steal the code and start using it without communicating with us. Or would you disagree?

The version on github is really the stand-alone (no hydro) version that we use for reionization simulations. Parts of it would be used when running together with hydro, but I think it is not completely plug and play for this (yet).

The reason I started sharing this with you is that you are the only other person I know who has a github account, and I wanted to test out how it works with collaborators. You can now contribute to the repository, right?

Cheers, Garrelt

P.S. Can I remind you of the project together with Peter Laursen? I really would like to make some progress there. Also, perhaps we should do some skype call soon and talk about future plans in general?

On 08/10/2011 03:24 AM, deprecated wrote:

Hi Garrelt

A few questions:

Is this now the canonical version of C2Ray?

Is this repo public, or are you paying github to let you have private repos?

If it is public, then does that mean you would be ok with me putting Phab-C2 on github? Currently only the input scripts and the post-processing suite are here. The code itself is on my own git server, only accessible from inside the CRyA firewall.

Cheers

Will

PS. The real motive for writing this was to try out the new Github Issues app for iOS.

will-henney commented 13 years ago

Hi Garrelt

Testing to see how well it works to reply by email to an Issue (never done this before!).

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:27 AM, garrelt reply@reply.github.com wrote:

Well, I decided to put C2-Ray on github so as to have a more modern rcs and to more easily give collaborators access to C2-Ray. At the moment it is public, but without proper documentation, I think this does not mean much. I am pretty sure that Paul would object to it being public, but from previous experience I must say that even those whom we help have quite some difficulties getting going with the code, so those who just get a copy will be pretty much lost (or if they are smart enough to figure everything out, they will have probably written their own code).

I may in the future start paying, or possibly we could use the CITA github account for this (the N-body code we are using CubeP3M will be there).

For my part it is ok to put Phab-C2 on github public too, for the same reasons. I do not think that people will find it easy to steal the code and start using it without communicating with us. Or would you disagree?

OK, thanks. Personally the only worry I have about making things public is that I will inadvertently upset somebody. I agree that the risk that someone is going to steal our ideas and/or code is almost nil and certainly not worth worrying about.

The version on github is really the stand-alone (no hydro) version that we use for reionization simulations. Parts of it would be used when running together with hydro, but I think it is not completely plug and play for this (yet).

The reason I started sharing this with you is that you are the only other person I know who has a github account, and I wanted to test out how it works with collaborators. You can now contribute to the repository, right?

Cheers, Garrelt

P.S. Can I remind you of the project together with Peter Laursen? I really would like to make some progress there.

Yes, He wrote to me in the holidays and it got buried. I will dig it out now.

Also, perhaps we should do some skype call soon and talk about future plans in general?

Sure. Let me know when would be convenient.

Cheers

Will

  Dr William Henney, Centro de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica,   Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Campus Morelia

will-henney commented 13 years ago

P.S. No I haven't tried committing to the repo yet. I will try it later. I will make my own branch, so there is no danger of me screwing things up.