Open garylow2001 opened 1 year ago
No details provided by team.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: No details were provided by the team as to why this is rejected, despite it being a valid bug as proven in my bug report.
Additional points to re-iterate: 1) This bug is related to duplicate detection as mentioned under the "feature flaw" section of the PE Guide.
2) There was no mention of duplicate detection in the UG which I could base my assumptions on when dealing with this bug. (such as whether a patient can be a dentist, or what constitutes a "different person")
How to replicate:
add-dentist n/John Doe p/98765432 s/Orthodontics y/5
followed byedit-dentist 8 n/Alex Yeohh
Actual: There is both an "Alex Yeohh" in patient list and dentist list, which has the same name but with other fields that are different.
Expected: 1) If you are allowed to have the same person as a patient and a dentist, there should be a warning/confirmation to ask if you wish to enter the same person as a patient and dentist so that all the other fields (phone/address/email etc) are also copied over so they are the same and can clearly reflect the same person 2) If you are not allowed to have the same person as a patient and dentist, then there should be a warning that disallows the user to change a person's name to be both a patient and dentist.