Closed Certiman closed 3 months ago
I propose to move the EVA and EVR related classes to the ERA Vocabulary itself:
The EVR regulation requires a :VehicleRegistration
to have:
(era:evrIndex
)
era:inCountry
era:areaOfUse
of all the underlying era:AuthorisationCase
s. These must therefore be linked to the VehicleRegistration as well.era:AuthorisationCase
contains also exactly one vehicle type, which is the 'ERATV reference' of the Vehicle registration. era:additionalConditionsApplicableVehicle
We can have instances of era:Vehicle
link to this registration data. The Vehicle instances themselves must have:
era:manufacturingSerialNumber
era:manufacturingYear
.Other properties of VehicleRegistration are as well strongly linked to the ERA Vocabulary, hence the proposition to place them all there (in version 5.0.0 and 5.1.0 of the ERA Vocabulary).
Dear @Certiman, can we have a workshop to update the ontology and Widoco? next week?
</p>
without<p>