gaur9 / armitage

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/armitage
0 stars 0 forks source link

Select workspace in Metasploit DB #133

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
1. If I had a million dollars to pay you (that's what it'd cost if you
weren't so nice), I'd like you to add...
The add the possibility to select which workspace to use in the Metasploit 
database. Right now, Armitage selects "default", which can not be changed.

2. Because this feature doesn't exist I have to...
I can not use Armitage because I use Metasploit workspaces a lot.

3. If you add this feature I will...
Be very happy...

Original issue reported on code.google.com by roel...@gmail.com on 28 Feb 2013 at 2:28

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
This won't happen. Armitage communicates with the Metasploit Framework's 
database instance directly. I don't have access to which workspace should be 
active at any given time. I recall there may have been a propagation issue too 
(e.g., if I change a workspace in one console, it applies to future consoles, 
but not to the current ones... it's been awhile).

Armitage's dynamic workspaces feature is the substitute for this capability. 
They give you the ability to group hosts as you desire, but unlike the 
framework's workspaces feature, they're dynamic.

Original comment by rsmu...@gmail.com on 6 Mar 2013 at 11:03

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
i'm reopening this ticket, from a conversation on IRC, there may be an 
in-between I can get to.

Original comment by rsmu...@gmail.com on 6 Mar 2013 at 11:21

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Thanks. Appreciate it.

Original comment by roel...@gmail.com on 7 Mar 2013 at 11:46

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
any update regarding this? I'm having the same issue.

Original comment by z...@overcrypt.com on 1 Jan 2014 at 10:45

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
At the moment... I'm not planning to pursue this. It would be some ugly code to 
pull off.

Original comment by rsmu...@gmail.com on 1 Jan 2014 at 7:10