Can consider separating components in the sequence diagrams

[gavin331]

For the redo function, the Logic and Model components are separated into 2 diagrams. However, some sequence models like the above did not separate them, and sequence diagrams should be illustrating for 1 component only without providing too much details of the 2nd component.

[nus-pe-script]

Team's Response

This is just a preference of how we want our sequence diagram to be represented. There is no error in our sequence diagram. Both are correct but just represented in the way the developer intended.

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue response

Team chose [response.Rejected]

• [ ] I disagree

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]

---

## :question: Issue severity Team chose [`severity.VeryLow`] Originally [`severity.Low`] - [ ] I disagree **Reason for disagreement:** [replace this with your explanation]

---