Open fatbasstard opened 2 years ago
I opened issue #105 to debate a future system for saving configuration & settings, please take a look if you have any ideas. I personally don't believe that the Registry is a feasible location for data storage for the long-term future of this project. My suggestion is that we investigate various formats of file-based storage, but my instinct would be to make this specific to the user. It sounds like you want a global (system-wide) settings system, could you explain your case a little more? I'm not familial with Chef.
Chef is a configuration management tool. In short: Automated desired state maintenance. Other tools usually used are Ansible or Puppet.
In short: I've got a bunch of Windows machines that are maintained through code and automation. Chef runs under the SYSTEM
user and (in short) installs and configured the machines and software.
If chef allows for deploying application state configurations to the user (directory), then I think this may be the best solution going forward. Again I'm not familiar with Chef or conf. management in general so I'll need your expertise on that matter.
At the moment the settings are stored in the
HKEY_CURRENT_USER
, this is annoying when using automation to install and configure WinNUT.We use Chef to install and configure WinNUT which works great if I manually kick off a Chef run, but when it runs in the automated scheduled way it's not useable: The schuled task for Chef runs as
SYSTEM
so it's no so trivial to set the correct settings.Is it an option to move the configuration to
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE
or maybe even better support both (let CURRENT_USER overwrite LOCAL_MACHINE)?