Clearly using automated commits to generate the "Abolish ICE" in the rice field display and no substantial projects.
And at 18,000 commits nearly twice the commit count of the Number 2 user at 10,000 commits, which also seems very unlikely...
Perhaps there should also be an automatic exclusion on wildly different numbers from the standard distribution one would expect in a large randomized population?
See the problem with this screenshot of the Number 1 top ranked UK user by public contributions?
https://github.com/gayanvoice/top-github-users/blob/main/markdown/public_contributions/united_kingdom.md
Clearly using automated commits to generate the "Abolish ICE" in the rice field display and no substantial projects.
And at 18,000 commits nearly twice the commit count of the Number 2 user at 10,000 commits, which also seems very unlikely...
Perhaps there should also be an automatic exclusion on wildly different numbers from the standard distribution one would expect in a large randomized population?