Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Original comment by shiq...@gmail.com
on 31 Oct 2008 at 6:42
The user clarified:
date Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:10 AM
subject Re: [googletest] Feature request: custom ResultPrinter
Hi ,
Thanks Zhanyong for your response; I'm happy to hear that you plan to
open up the event listener.
I have to admit that I missed the GoogleTestDevGuide page, but anyway
now I think my patch is not enough, so I don't want to have it
reviewed.
The listener I have in mind would write the test results to several
files (sorted in a directory structure by testcase and test) also a
summary file would be written. These files would also be used within
tests for logging.
It is not so important for unit tests but as I plan to use the
framework also as test controller for component and even subsystem
tests it gets more important there.
I already have a implementation using cppunit; but I'm now thinking
about a switch to googletest.
Regards,
Stefan.
Original comment by shiq...@gmail.com
on 4 Nov 2008 at 10:24
Original comment by shiq...@gmail.com
on 2 Dec 2008 at 5:01
Some users want to check heap leak in every test. Opening up the event listener
interface would allow them to do that by responding to "test start" and "test
end"
events. Therefore I'm bumping up the priority to high.
Original comment by zhanyong...@gmail.com
on 12 Jan 2009 at 5:43
Issue 77 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by vladlosev
on 5 Jun 2009 at 10:41
For those who missed the announcement in the mailing list:
We have the design for the event listener interface out and open for comments.
The
design document is available at
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dhspb9bn_6gqdknqhp. If
you want some features that are not covered by it, please respond with comments
to
the announcement at
http://groups.google.com/group/googletestframework/browse_thread/thread/d80823ac
c6c73d58.
Original comment by vladlosev
on 5 Jun 2009 at 11:04
Original comment by zhanyong...@gmail.com
on 23 Sep 2009 at 10:32
This is available in SVN in revision 320.
Original comment by vladlosev
on 1 Oct 2009 at 10:38
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
housemaister
on 30 Oct 2008 at 2:52Attachments: