Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
This of course would be an improvement, not a defect.
Original comment by schre...@gmail.com
on 25 Nov 2008 at 1:32
We considered this before, and decided against it as it makes the
implementation more complex without adding enough value. There are
cases where you have to disable this forking behavior, so there needs
to be a way for the user to express the choice, which adds to the
complexity of the system. We agree that test isolation is nice, but
think the price is too high. Thanks.
If you are not convinced, please start a discussion on the discussion group.
Original comment by shiq...@gmail.com
on 27 Nov 2008 at 12:04
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
schre...@gmail.com
on 25 Nov 2008 at 1:30