Closed Rangi42 closed 1 week ago
Calling it "end of file" would sometimes result in error messages saying "expected end of file or end of file". Calling it "end of input" sounds to me like the end of all the input, not just some inner buffer. Though I agree "buffer" is a technical term, would be nice to have a better one. (What exactly are they for? The end of INCLUDE
d files? Expanded EQUS
and/or {interpolations}` and/or macro args? Maybe "end of included file" or "end of expanded string" would be good?)
It's for the end of included files.
It's for the end of included files.
Apparently it's also for the end of REPT/FOR and MACRO bodies.
Let's leave potentially renaming EOB for another PR?
Fixes #1514