Closed rofl0r closed 3 years ago
For point 1, it's standard for the rest of programs, I understand that, but we've been using rgbds/
for a while, so I believe it's better to stay consistent with our previous releases (for uniformity) than to switch to adhering to that convention.
The source tarballs include tests because some distros like testing software they build; I believe it helps ensure the stability of custom build options and patches.
For point 1, it's standard for the rest of programs, I understand that, but we've been using
rgbds/
for a while, so I believe it's better to stay consistent with our previous releases (for uniformity) than to switch to adhering to that convention.
As long as there's a subdirectory, IMO it's fine, be it name or name-version.
1) it's convention to have a tarball extract to a directory of the same name - rgbds-0.5.1.tar.gz should extract to "rgbds-0.5.1", not "rgbds"
2) the source tarball is a lot bigger than the distributed binaries, because it contains 11MB of binary tests. i suppose those could be omitted.