Open janahoffmann opened 13 years ago
Dependency:- Pre-Ingest and taxon finder services - needs to define index in solr. Data has to come from Pre-Ingest and searching correct fields from OLEF. We can prepare function in portal i.e. so long as data can be driven thru.. then the portal can pick it up. (WK)
This is now possible in our portal using sample data (spices books).
2.1.2 - Search content by scientific (binominal, Latin) name (renamed, Advanced search)
COR number: 2.1.2 Testing platform: http://bhl-test.nhm.ac.uk/portal/ Function: Advanced search
Description:
Search by scientific name (genus, species, binominal, taxon), search in metadata/ OCR text
„expand search“ function
@AnneSch @AntonioGVH @fwelter @grahamhrbge1670 @heimor @HenningScholz @JFTester @JiriFrank @LarissaS @RalfH
2.1.2 - Search content by scientific (binominal, Latin) name (renamed, Advanced search)
COR number: 2.1.2 Testing platform: http://bhl-test.nhm.ac.uk/portal/ Function: Advanced search
Description:
Search by scientific name (genus, species, binominal, taxon), search in metadata/ OCR text
„expand search“ function
@AntonioGVH @fwelter @LarissaS
Same applies as before: what is not in the metadata can not be found. As TaxonFinder comes at Pre-Ingest, we don't have the taxonomic information ready now. So I think the infrastructure is there, but we cant see it working properly without the Pre-Ingest. Is that correct?
Von: JiriFrank [mailto:reply@reply.github.com] Gesendet: Di 17.01.2012 15:08 An: Scholz, Henning Betreff: Re: [bhle] 2.1.2 - Search content by scientific (binominal, Latin) name (renamed, Advanced search) (#75)
2.1.2 - Search content by scientific (binominal, Latin) name (renamed, Advanced search)
COR number: 2.1.2 Testing platform: http://bhl-test.nhm.ac.uk/portal/ Function: Advanced search
Description:
Search by scientific name (genus, species, binominal, taxon), search in metadata/ OCR text
"expand search" function
@AnneSch @AntonioGVH @fwelter @grahamhrbge1670 @heimor @HenningScholz @JFTester @JiriFrank @LarissaS @RalfH
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/bhle/bhle/issues/75#issuecomment-3528255
It works. But there are some open questions.
I searched for e.g. Thalictrum minus.
(1) First question: Do I need to tick the exact word /phrase box? Obviously not, but many users will have the same "problem".
(2) Well the result (Flora de Catalunya) is ok. The user will click on read book. That works. But then he or she has to type Thalictrum minus again. Same question as before: exact phrase and how to deal with it? The search results in the documents are a mixture of results referring to Thalictrum or minus, not to the binomial Thalictrum minus. Anyway, it would be nice that search results in the selected book would be displayed automatically. Currently, you have to type the scientific name again and the results are not really what you are looking for.
This may refer partly to other CORs.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: JiriFrank [mailto:reply@reply.github.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Januar 2012 15:08 An: Hand, Ralf Betreff: Re: [bhle] 2.1.2 - Search content by scientific (binominal, Latin) name (renamed, Advanced search) (#75)
2.1.2 - Search content by scientific (binominal, Latin) name (renamed, Advanced search)
COR number: 2.1.2 Testing platform: http://bhl-test.nhm.ac.uk/portal/ Function: Advanced search
Description:
Search by scientific name (genus, species, binominal, taxon), search in metadata/ OCR text
"expand search" function
@AnneSch @AntonioGVH @fwelter @grahamhrbge1670 @heimor @HenningScholz @JFTester @JiriFrank @LarissaS @RalfH
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/bhle/bhle/issues/75#issuecomment-3528255
This is interesting, I did not got it to work using a different name that is present in another book, but the example used by Ralf is working. Would be interesting to know why. I assume, as the OLEF file is created manually, the Taxon Finder information is missing and thus it is not working for all books. This is also the reason why you need to search again in the content viewer without getting the same result, as the Taxon Finder results are not in the data yet that are included for a book. Would be interesting to know if it is really a data problem or a useability problem.
Henning
Dr. Henning Scholz Museum für Naturkunde | Leibniz Institute for Research on Evolution and Biodiversity at the Humboldt University Berlin Invalidenstraße 43 | D-10115 Berlin | Germany Tel.: +49-30-2093-8864 | Fax: +49-30-2093-8868 Email: henning.scholz@mfn-berlin.de http://www.naturkundemuseum-berlin.de/ / http://www.bivalve.de http://www.bhl-europe.eu / http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ BHL-Europe in Europeana: bit.ly/BHLE-Europeana
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: RalfH [mailto:reply@reply.github.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 20. Januar 2012 14:21 An: Scholz, Henning Betreff: Re: [bhle] 2.1.2 - Search content by scientific (binominal, Latin) name (renamed, Advanced search) (#75)
It works. But there are some open questions.
I searched for e.g. Thalictrum minus.
(1) First question: Do I need to tick the exact word /phrase box? Obviously not, but many users will have the same "problem".
(2) Well the result (Flora de Catalunya) is ok. The user will click on read book. That works. But then he or she has to type Thalictrum minus again. Same question as before: exact phrase and how to deal with it? The search results in the documents are a mixture of results referring to Thalictrum or minus, not to the binomial Thalictrum minus. Anyway, it would be nice that search results in the selected book would be displayed automatically. Currently, you have to type the scientific name again and the results are not really what you are looking for.
This may refer partly to other CORs.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: JiriFrank [mailto:reply@reply.github.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Januar 2012 15:08 An: Hand, Ralf Betreff: Re: [bhle] 2.1.2 - Search content by scientific (binominal, Latin) name (renamed, Advanced search) (#75)
2.1.2 - Search content by scientific (binominal, Latin) name (renamed, Advanced search)
COR number: 2.1.2 Testing platform: http://bhl-test.nhm.ac.uk/portal/ Function: Advanced search
Description:
Search by scientific name (genus, species, binominal, taxon), search in metadata/ OCR text
"expand search" function
@AnneSch @AntonioGVH @fwelter @grahamhrbge1670 @heimor @HenningScholz @JFTester @JiriFrank @LarissaS @RalfH
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/bhle/bhle/issues/75#issuecomment-3528255
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/bhle/bhle/issues/75#issuecomment-3583364
I found another interesting thing: when I search for Thalictrum in simple search I get results. Thalictrum, however, is not in the facet list. When I pick Umbelliferae from the facet list and search for it again, I get no result in whatever field I'm looking for. If I pick another term from the facet list (Halme), I get results. Strange....
Dr. Henning Scholz Museum für Naturkunde | Leibniz Institute for Research on Evolution and Biodiversity at the Humboldt University Berlin Invalidenstraße 43 | D-10115 Berlin | Germany Tel.: +49-30-2093-8864 | Fax: +49-30-2093-8868 Email: henning.scholz@mfn-berlin.de http://www.naturkundemuseum-berlin.de/ / http://www.bivalve.de http://www.bhl-europe.eu / http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ BHL-Europe in Europeana: bit.ly/BHLE-Europeana
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: RalfH [mailto:reply@reply.github.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 20. Januar 2012 14:21 An: Scholz, Henning Betreff: Re: [bhle] 2.1.2 - Search content by scientific (binominal, Latin) name (renamed, Advanced search) (#75)
It works. But there are some open questions.
I searched for e.g. Thalictrum minus.
(1) First question: Do I need to tick the exact word /phrase box? Obviously not, but many users will have the same "problem".
(2) Well the result (Flora de Catalunya) is ok. The user will click on read book. That works. But then he or she has to type Thalictrum minus again. Same question as before: exact phrase and how to deal with it? The search results in the documents are a mixture of results referring to Thalictrum or minus, not to the binomial Thalictrum minus. Anyway, it would be nice that search results in the selected book would be displayed automatically. Currently, you have to type the scientific name again and the results are not really what you are looking for.
This may refer partly to other CORs.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: JiriFrank [mailto:reply@reply.github.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Januar 2012 15:08 An: Hand, Ralf Betreff: Re: [bhle] 2.1.2 - Search content by scientific (binominal, Latin) name (renamed, Advanced search) (#75)
2.1.2 - Search content by scientific (binominal, Latin) name (renamed, Advanced search)
COR number: 2.1.2 Testing platform: http://bhl-test.nhm.ac.uk/portal/ Function: Advanced search
Description:
Search by scientific name (genus, species, binominal, taxon), search in metadata/ OCR text
"expand search" function
@AnneSch @AntonioGVH @fwelter @grahamhrbge1670 @heimor @HenningScholz @JFTester @JiriFrank @LarissaS @RalfH
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/bhle/bhle/issues/75#issuecomment-3528255
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/bhle/bhle/issues/75#issuecomment-3583364
I am not sure this function works properly. I looked by A. muricatus, that I know is in the work 'Flora de Catalunya', but the advance search function only gave me Karsten Deutschen Flora.
By the way, I had to look 'Flora de Catalunya' in Google books, because the BHL-E web does not respond when I ask for the pdf.
Quoting JiriFrank:
2.1.2 - Search content by scientific (binominal, Latin) name (renamed, Advanced search)
COR number: 2.1.2 Testing platform: http://bhl-test.nhm.ac.uk/portal/ Function: Advanced search
Description:
Search by scientific name (genus, species, binominal, taxon), search in metadata/ OCR text
„expand search“ function
@AntonioGVH @fwelter @LarissaS
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/bhle/bhle/issues/75#issuecomment-3560969
Is working, but I got different results: When I type in "Cirsium palustre", I got some results, same as "Cirsium" (e.g., Billeder af Nordens flora). Instead, when I type in "Orchis mascula", I do not get any matches, but it is in the "New british flora" (It got found in the OCR when I look for it in the text).
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: JiriFrank [mailto:reply@reply.github.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Januar 2012 15:08 An: Scholz, Annemarie Betreff: Re: [bhle] 2.1.2 - Search content by scientific (binominal, Latin) name (renamed, Advanced search) (#75)
2.1.2 - Search content by scientific (binominal, Latin) name (renamed, Advanced search)
COR number: 2.1.2 Testing platform: http://bhl-test.nhm.ac.uk/portal/ Function: Advanced search
Description:
Search by scientific name (genus, species, binominal, taxon), search in metadata/ OCR text
"expand search" function
@AnneSch @AntonioGVH @fwelter @grahamhrbge1670 @heimor @HenningScholz @JFTester @JiriFrank @LarissaS @RalfH
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/bhle/bhle/issues/75#issuecomment-3528255
The feature seems to works in principle, but closer specification is needed. Also it will be important to test with more content.
Request from testing is add concrete location of Scientific name in content. Need to be solved. Issue #292
Will be tested again with more content from PI.
In Facet list is displayed just genus name. Is the binominal name required for facet list? I will be helpful.
@chris-sleep @lobajuluwa @heimor
Done and testable.
2.1.2 - Search content by scientific (binominal, Latin) name (renamed, Advanced search)
COR number: 2.1.2 Testing platform: http://bhl-test.nhm.ac.uk/portal/ Function: Simple search, Advanced search
Description:
Search by scientific name (genus, species, binominal, taxon), search in metadata/ OCR text
Check Scientific name in simple search and use Scientific name category for the search field in Advanced search.
Latin names are displayed in facet list in category Scientific name (showing all taxons included in books in result list).
Testers: @AnneSch @AntonioGVH @fwelter @grahamhrbge1670 @heimor @HenningScholz @JFTester @JiriFrank @LarissaS @RalfH
2.1.2 - Search content by scientific (binominal, Latin) name (renamed, Advanced search)
COR number: 2.1.2 Testing platform: http://bhl-test.nhm.ac.uk/portal/ Function: Simple search, Advanced search
Description:
Search by scientific name (genus, species, binominal, taxon), search in metadata/ OCR text
Check Scientific name in simple search and use Scientific name category for the search field in Advanced search.
Latin names are displayed in facet list in category Scientific name (showing all taxons included in books in result list).
@GregKenicer @GeoffHarper @KasiaGoral @MartinaMetzger @DanielFisher @NeilWoodcock @SaraPerzley @SaraCarlton @HannaKoivula @PaiviLipsanen
2.1.2 - Search content by scientific (binominal, Latin) name (renamed, Advanced search)
COR number: 2.1.2 Testing platform: http://bhl-test.nhm.ac.uk/portal/ Function: Simple search, Advanced search
Description:
Search by scientific name (genus, species, binominal, taxon), search in metadata/ OCR text
Check Scientific name in simple search and use Scientific name category for the search field in Advanced search.
Latin names are displayed in facet list in category Scientific name (showing all taxons included in books in result list).
@PaiviJaakkola @SiniKarki @TiinaOnttonen
This seems to work in most cases, but not all, e.g. Aira caespitosa, gives no results also the facet list shows the name.
Von: JiriFrank [mailto:reply@reply.github.com] Gesendet: Do 12.04.2012 18:17 An: Scholz, Henning Betreff: Re: [bhle] 2.1.2 - Search content by scientific (binominal, Latin) name (renamed, Advanced search) (#75)
2.1.2 - Search content by scientific (binominal, Latin) name (renamed, Advanced search)
COR number: 2.1.2 Testing platform: http://bhl-test.nhm.ac.uk/portal/ Function: Simple search, Advanced search
Description:
Search by scientific name (genus, species, binominal, taxon), search in metadata/ OCR text
Check Scientific name in simple search and use Scientific name category for the search field in Advanced search.
Latin names are displayed in facet list in category Scientific name (showing all taxons included in books in result list).
Testers: @AnneSch @AntonioGVH @fwelter @grahamhrbge1670 @heimor @HenningScholz @JFTester @JiriFrank @LarissaS @RalfH
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/bhle/bhle/issues/75#issuecomment-5094655
This is working as far as I can see. Note that the uBio does not pick up all names on a page, but understand this is not crucial at the moment. Facet list working as expected.
Re-tested using "Hordeum vulgare" as test name. Search for "Hordeum vulgare" in Simple Search with Scientific name box checked : 1 book returned. Search for "Hordeum vulgare" in Advanced Search set to scientific name, no results. Something not quite right.
Opened book that was retrieved in Simple Search to locate references to "Hordeum vulgare" : search inside function not operating as expected, instead all search terms entered when set to search, put an arrow at Page 1 of the retrieved book, and this is not opening when clicked.
Sorry, it was more for this function: Now after email of Henning I see this arrow! This is really difficult to find, how you want to explain all users where to look for?! It works but not properly. For example, I open Vinson and in facet list I see a lot of scirntific names. I use Attus (13 results) and via advanced search I indeed get Vinson back, but it's not shown on what pages I can find Attus. So I search content again for Attus and get yellow point with white box where nothing is written and in the box left it's written no names found! So for me this function is not trustable!
-----Original Message----- From: JiriFrank [mailto:reply@reply.github.com] Sent: 11 апреля 2012 г. 16:37 To: Smirnova Larissa Subject: Re: [bhle] 2.1.2 - Search content by scientific (binominal, Latin) name (renamed, Advanced search) (#75)
Done and testable.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/bhle/bhle/issues/75#issuecomment-5070137
17/4/2012 - Filtered through antispam by ICT
Works fine.
Search by scientific name (genus, species, binominal, taxon), search in metadata/ OCR text
Precondition: uBio integration (TaxonFinder), save coordinates of names found in OCR in metadata (OLEF)