Open dagendresen opened 1 year ago
Most (13542) of them are from "tnd hos Havforskningsinstituttet" - I can't find any reference to that but I guess it's the IMR datasets which are unpublished? Possibly http://gbif.imr.no/ipt/resource?r=imr ? @knutanders perhaps you can shed some light?
Knut will be able to look at this once he's back from summer vacation.
Knut to follow up on this, and the IMR IPT issue.
Artskart has more Pandalus records for Norway than GBIF because IMR has datasets that are not registered to GBIF - as @rukayaj suggested in a previous comment. I've had a meeting with IMR regarding the issue, and they have confirmed that they will register the datasets.
Hey,
I think the issue is that the IMR datasets are shared with EMODnet which republishes the dataset through Eurobis IPT (https://ipt.vliz.be/eurobis/?search=imr&sort=name&order=asc). The republished dataset from Eurobis goes to EMODnet and OBIS, but not GBIF.
For example
IMR IPT: https://gbif.imr.no/ipt/resource?r=imr_capelin_larvae_monitoring Eurobis IPT: https://ipt.vliz.be/eurobis/resource?r=capelin_larvae
The copy from Eurobis IPT has External data:
Is it possible to use OBIS Network from the original endpoint (IMR) to get the dataset into OBIS and EMODnet instead of Eurobis republishing the dataset? @pieterprovoost @rubenpp7
Please tell me if I am wrong :D Thanks a lot!!
Hi @ymgan
it is possible indeed and it should be the goal. I am working on a procedure for EurOBIS to redefine our dataflow since we have the same issue with a number of other datasets.
Its implementation has to be done carefully to ensure there is no data loss since in some cases the 2 versions of the dataset differ considerably
Cheers!
Hi, thank you for your insights! I was wondering if there has been any further development on this?
There are many more Pandulus occurrence records on Artskart than in the GBIF portal...?