Dataset #3 from Naturrestaurering

[rukayaj]

Through google translate: This is a dataset made on different meadows in and around Oslo. For each meadow, 14 route analyses have been performed with presence / absence of species (All species within a square of 0.5x0.5 m have been registered). I have coordinates on each meadow, but not on the exact position of each route analysis

I think it is wise to keep the structure in the data so that it is clear that each of the route analyses "is connected" and it is not just entered as "3 yellow goose flowers on the site". How can I set up the data to keep this structure? Below is a small excerpt of the table showing three route analyses at a locality.

[rukayaj]

For the location problem, I think perhaps https://docs.gbif.org/georeferencing-best-practices/1.0/en/#determining-spatial-fit and https://dwc.tdwg.org/terms/#dwc:pointRadiusSpatialFit with lat/long/uncertainty radius would be useful, or better would be https://dwc.tdwg.org/terms/#dwc:footprintSpatialFit if he has a WKT polygon of the meadow. What do you think @vidarbakken @dagendresen ?

[rukayaj]

I have suggested he adds each 5x5 plot as event, like this with presence and absence data https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Io5DlonmHZesdVDnYgjW6GSruRsxYPvBypVGNddODCg/edit?usp=sharing​

Edit: I just remembered we changed this and said we weren't going to publish absence data - https://github.com/gbif-norway/documentation/wiki/Data-publishing#protocol-with-absence-data. Will send a follow up email!

[rukayaj]

Last we heard (on 14-05-2021) Jørn is still working on this. I have not heard anything back from him since, have you @vidarbakken ?

[vidarbakken]

No contact with me I plan to take contact with all the projects that got money for this year quite soon.