Closed sdaume closed 9 years ago
Sure thing. Do you wish publisher (which will be an ID to an institution which in some cases will be difficult to resolve for legacy data), or do you mean the country of publisher please?
I'd recommend the later as I doubt it makes too much sense to use a per institution analysis.
I was actually thinking about country + institution (ID and/or name possibly). My guess would be that for invasive species observations the number of reporting institutions per country is fairly limited, but maybe I am wrong. Let me know if this is feasible or if we may end up with a very large dataset.
I actually used the wrong query number for this request. Query 4 ("pollinators") now has 'publisher_id', 'publisher_country' added. This should remain as I would like to explore this for pollinators as well, but could we add 'publisher_id', 'publisher_country' to query 5 as well?
Is it possible to include the publisher in the invasive species query ("query 4"). I would like to explore if there are strong geographical and temporal biases in the records with regard to the publishers.