A GBIF user has made GBIF helpdesk aware of an issue in the current GBIF taxonomic backbone for species authored by Mc Vaugh/McVaugh. It seems that the name appears with both spellings in various checklists and therefore is included twice in the backbone - as an example, see: https://www.gbif.org/species/search?q=Eugenia%20minuscula&qField=SCIENTIFIC
One is doubtful and the other is accepted, however. @mdoering - could this also be related to what you mentioned at the data use club practical session where both records with status' are kept? If so, what was the explanation?
A GBIF user has made GBIF helpdesk aware of an issue in the current GBIF taxonomic backbone for species authored by Mc Vaugh/McVaugh. It seems that the name appears with both spellings in various checklists and therefore is included twice in the backbone - as an example, see: https://www.gbif.org/species/search?q=Eugenia%20minuscula&qField=SCIENTIFIC
One is doubtful and the other is accepted, however. @mdoering - could this also be related to what you mentioned at the data use club practical session where both records with status' are kept? If so, what was the explanation?