gbif / backbone-feedback

1 stars 0 forks source link

Unflagged duplicates in the latest GBIF backbone taxonomy #22

Open Mesibov opened 3 months ago

Mesibov commented 3 months ago

Entries from Taxon.tsv in the attached file are from kingdom Animalia and have a valid rank and "accepted" status, but are apparent duplicates and have not been flagged "Possible variant...". Fields shown are:

taxonID | datasetID | parentNameUsageID | acceptedNameUsageID | originalNameUsageID | scientificName | scientificNameAuthorship | canonicalName | genericName | specificEpithet | infraspecificEpithet | taxonRank | nameAccordingTo | namePublishedIn | taxonomicStatus | nomenclaturalStatus | taxonRemarks | kingdom | phylum | class | order | family | genus

unflagged-duplicates.txt

ManonGros commented 12 hours ago

Almost all these duplicates are due to a difference in authorship. It seems like in many cases (WORMS and ITIS) the issue were solved since the latest backbone taxonomy (at least I cannot find them in the upcoming version). I reported the other issues to the sources. Hopefully, we won't see these duplicates in the next version.