On https://www.gbif.org/species/8545692 the author is given as (L.) Koch. This gives the impression that the author was first Linnaeus, then Koch. In fact this species was described by Ludwig Koch (as opposed to his father Carl Ludwig, and so the author should be L. Koch, 1879. #38
On https://www.gbif.org/species/8545692 the author is given as (L.) Koch. This gives the impression that the author was first Linnaeus, then Koch. In fact this species was described by Ludwig Koch (as opposed to his father Carl Ludwig, and so the author should be L. Koch, 1879.
User: See in registry - Send email
System: Chrome 121.0.0 / Windows 10.0.0
Referer: https://www.gbif.org/species/8545692
Window size: width 1366 - height 641
API log&_a=(columns:!(_source),filters:!(),index:'3390a910-fcda-11ea-a9ab-4375f2a9d11c',interval:auto,query:(language:kuery,query:''),sort:!()))
Site log&_a=(columns:!(_source),filters:!(),index:'5c73f360-fce3-11ea-a9ab-4375f2a9d11c',interval:auto,query:(language:kuery,query:''),sort:!()))
System health at time of feedback: OPERATIONAL
On
https://www.gbif.org/species/8545692
the author is given as (L.) Koch. This gives the impression that the author was first Linnaeus, then Koch. In fact this species was described by Ludwig Koch (as opposed to his father Carl Ludwig, and so the author should be L. Koch, 1879.User: See in registry - Send email System: Chrome 121.0.0 / Windows 10.0.0 Referer: https://www.gbif.org/species/8545692 Window size: width 1366 - height 641 API log&_a=(columns:!(_source),filters:!(),index:'3390a910-fcda-11ea-a9ab-4375f2a9d11c',interval:auto,query:(language:kuery,query:''),sort:!())) Site log&_a=(columns:!(_source),filters:!(),index:'5c73f360-fce3-11ea-a9ab-4375f2a9d11c',interval:auto,query:(language:kuery,query:''),sort:!())) System health at time of feedback: OPERATIONAL