search

gbif / backbone-feedback

2 stars 0 forks source link

missing authorship #420

Open gbif-portal opened 4 years ago

gbif-portal commented 4 years ago

missing authorship

The correct name (epithet) is:

Leptestheria dahalacensis (Rueppell, in Straus-Duerckheim 1837)

User: See in registry System: Opera 70.0.3728 / Windows 10.0.0 Referer: https://www.gbif.org/species/10517921 Window size: width 2023 - height 1040 API log&_a=(columns:!(_source),index:'prod-varnish-',interval:auto,query:(query_string:(analyze_wildcard:!t,query:'response:%3E499')),sort:!('@timestamp',desc))) Site log&_a=(columns:!(_source),index:'prod-portal-',interval:auto,query:(query_string:(analyze_wildcard:!t,query:'response:%3E499')),sort:!('@timestamp',desc))) System health at time of feedback: OPERATIONAL

ManonGros commented 4 years ago

The name comes from the barcode of life. We should contact them.

jhnwllr commented 3 years ago

contacted iBol via email.

jhnwllr commented 2 years ago

name is now Leptestheria dahalacensis (Rüppel, 1837) https://www.gbif.org/species/10517921

but user claims name should be Leptestheria dahalacensis (Rueppell, in Straus-Duerckheim 1837)

and new source is the GBIF Backbone Patch https://www.gbif.org/dataset/daacce49-b206-469b-8dc2-2257719f3afa

@mdoering Should the authorship still be changed?

ahahn-gbif commented 2 years ago

The backbone patch dataset today contains two versions of the name, one clearly a misspelling, concerning both the species epithet and the author name:

Citations across literature seem to agree on the spelling Leptestheria dahalacensis (Rüppel, 1837).