search

gbif / backbone-feedback

2 stars 0 forks source link

Swedish name wrong #459

Open gbif-portal opened 5 years ago

gbif-portal commented 5 years ago

Swedish name wrong

This is not "Blomsterlupin" in Swedish. Centaurea jacea is "rödklint" in Swedish. Blomserlupin is Lupinus polyphyllus.

User: See in registry System: Chrome 77.0.3865 / Windows 10.0.0 Referer: https://www.gbif.org/species/3128547 Window size: width 1768 - height 956 API log&_a=(columns:!(_source),index:'prod-varnish-',interval:auto,query:(query_string:(analyze_wildcard:!t,query:'response:%3E499')),sort:!('@timestamp',desc))) Site log&_a=(columns:!(_source),index:'prod-portal-',interval:auto,query:(query_string:(analyze_wildcard:!t,query:'response:%3E499')),sort:!('@timestamp',desc))) System health at time of feedback: OPERATIONAL

yroskov commented 5 years ago

It's not a CoL data.

ManonGros commented 5 years ago

In that case, where does this vernacular name come from? I don't see any source.

kcopas commented 5 years ago

Wikipedia, isn’t it?

Sent with GitHawk

ManonGros commented 5 years ago

I don't know, the current Swedish wikipedia page seems ok: https://sv.wiktionary.org/wiki/Centaurea_jacea Perhaps we have something outdated?

thomasstjerne commented 5 years ago

Normally, you can see what the source of the names is, but it seems that this has gone missing for some names: http://api.gbif.org/v1/species/3128547/vernacularNames

thomasstjerne commented 5 years ago

The sourceTaxonKey is still there however, revealing that the source is DAISIE - Inventory of alien invasive species in Europe they provide Blomsterlupin as swedish vernacularName here: https://www.gbif.org/species/159510008/verbatim

ManonGros commented 5 years ago

I reported the issue on the checklist repo: https://github.com/trias-project/daisie-checklist