search

gbif / backbone-feedback

1 stars 0 forks source link

Higher taxon matches of fish #473

Open gbif-portal opened 5 years ago

gbif-portal commented 5 years ago

Higher taxon matches of fish

Andrew Bentley says all these names are correct, could we investigate why they are flagged.

Some are new names, but others aren't.

Also, the fuzzy matches in the same dataset, and the other fish one from KU.

User provided contact info: @MattBlissett System: Firefox Mobile 61.0.0 / Android 8.0.0 User: See in registry Referer: https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/search?dataset_key=8f79c802-a58c-447f-99aa-1d6a0790825a&issue=TAXON_MATCH_HIGHERRANK Window size: width 360 - height 512 API log&_a=(columns:!(_source),index:'prod-varnish-',interval:auto,query:(query_string:(analyze_wildcard:!t,query:'response:%3E499')),sort:!('@timestamp',desc))) Site log&_a=(columns:!(_source),index:'prod-portal-',interval:auto,query:(query_string:(analyze_wildcard:!t,query:'response:%3E499')),sort:!('@timestamp',desc))) System health at time of feedback: OPERATIONAL

thomasstjerne commented 5 years ago

Seemingly it is not in the backbone. We only have from the NCBI checklist which is probably not a backbone constituent https://www.gbif.org/species/search?q=Paracanthocobitis%20aurea&advanced=1