gbif / backbone-feedback

1 stars 0 forks source link

this name should not be accepted and integrated under different taxon #489

Open gbif-portal opened 1 week ago

gbif-portal commented 1 week ago

this name should not be accepted and integrated under different taxon

The correct name should be Osyris lanceolata Hochst. & Steud. (https://www.gbif.org/species/3788959). As far as my search went, this name should not even be a synonym if one follows ipni (https://www.ipni.org/n/780506-1). I could not access the original publication Unio Itin. In sched., W.Schimper s.n. (1832) but Prodr.(DC), 14: 633 (1857) does not mention "ex A. DC". I believe all occurrences and pictures should be transferred to the other name.


Github user: @Squitoense User: See in registry - Send email System: Chrome 125.0.0 / Windows 10.0.0 Referer: https://www.gbif.org/species/7473922 Window size: width 1680 - height 889 API log&_a=(columns:!(_source),filters:!(),index:'3390a910-fcda-11ea-a9ab-4375f2a9d11c',interval:auto,query:(language:kuery,query:''),sort:!())) Site log&_a=(columns:!(_source),filters:!(),index:'5c73f360-fce3-11ea-a9ab-4375f2a9d11c',interval:auto,query:(language:kuery,query:''),sort:!())) System health at time of feedback: INFO