gbif / backbone-feedback

1 stars 0 forks source link

Dendrodrilus rubidus = Bimastos rubidus (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae), but both listed as acceptedi in GBIF backbone taxonomy, #50

Open gbif-portal opened 6 months ago

gbif-portal commented 6 months ago

Dendrodrilus rubidus = Bimastos rubidus (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae), but both listed as acceptedi in GBIF backbone taxonomy,

Annelida: Clitellata: Lumbricidae

Now both the two abovementioned genera and species are given as accepted in the backbone taxonomy.

Dendrodrilus contains a single species D. rubidus (Savigny, 1826) and part of its infraspecific divisions. https://www.gbif.org/species/2307771

Bimastos also contains B. rubidus (Savigny, 1826) and a number of subtaxa. https://www.gbif.org/species/4812279

Among synonyms of Bimastos Moore, 1893 is Dendrodrilus Omodeo, 1956 https://www.gbif.org/species/9508909 whereas the "accepted" Dendrodrilus is listed without an author https://www.gbif.org/species/2307771

As far as I see this is a confusion, where Dendrodrilus rubidus (Savigny, 1826) has been left as an orphan in a ghost genus, and should be returned in synonymy with B. rubidus (Savigny, 1826).

The recent review and checklist of Lumbricidae in Zootaxa (2023) only knows Bimastos, not Derndrodrilus.

https://mapress.com/zt/article/view/zootaxa.5255.1.33 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7301848

bw Risto Väinölä Finnish Museum of Natural History


User: See in registry - Send email System: Chrome 120.0.0 / Windows 10.0.0 Referer: https://www.gbif.org/species/4812279 Window size: width 1280 - height 571 API log&_a=(columns:!(_source),filters:!(),index:'3390a910-fcda-11ea-a9ab-4375f2a9d11c',interval:auto,query:(language:kuery,query:''),sort:!())) Site log&_a=(columns:!(_source),filters:!(),index:'5c73f360-fce3-11ea-a9ab-4375f2a9d11c',interval:auto,query:(language:kuery,query:''),sort:!())) System health at time of feedback: OPERATIONAL