search

gbif / backbone-feedback

2 stars 0 forks source link

Two accepted names for species #536

Open gbif-portal opened 1 month ago

gbif-portal commented 1 month ago

Two accepted names for species

I believe the records found here: https://www.gbif.org/species/2487866, and the records found here: https://www.gbif.org/species/4409010, are of the same species. However both names are accepted and there is no link between them.

User: See in registry - Send email System: Chrome 128.0.0 / Windows 10.0.0 Referer: https://www.gbif.org/species/2487866 Window size: width 1920 - height 919 API log&_a=(columns:!(_source),filters:!(),index:'3390a910-fcda-11ea-a9ab-4375f2a9d11c',interval:auto,query:(language:kuery,query:''),sort:!())) Site log&_a=(columns:!(_source),filters:!(),index:'5c73f360-fce3-11ea-a9ab-4375f2a9d11c',interval:auto,query:(language:kuery,query:''),sort:!())) System health at time of feedback: OPERATIONAL

DianRHR commented 2 weeks ago

This names are related in the xrelease, Poecile montanus (Conrad von Baldenstein, 1827) is the accepted name of Parus montanus Conrad von Baldenstein, 1827. Poecile montanus is currently provided by ITIS in the baseCOL, ans Parus montanus is beiong merged in the xrelease from the United Kingdom Species Inventory (UKSI) dataset.

Image