Open peterdesmet opened 8 years ago
The following subspecies/variety plant names are all matched to the incorrect infraspecific rank (e.g. variety to subspecies or vice versa):
Carduus nutans L. subsp. leiophyllus (Petrovič) Arènes Digitaria ciliaris (Retz.) Koeler subsp. ciliaris Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. subsp. sanguinalis Echinochloa muricata (Beauv.) Fernald subsp. muricata Galanthus nivalis L. var. nivalis Juncus tenuis Willd. subsp. tenuis Mentha x piperita L. nothosubsp. piperita Papaver somniferum L. subsp. somniferum Physalis longifolia Nutt. subsp. subglabrata (Mack. et Bush) Cronquist Salix purpurea L. var. purpurea Schkuhria pinnata (Lam.) O. Kuntze ex Thell. var. pinnata Scorpiurus muricatus L. subsp. muricatus Vicia narbonensis L. subsp. narbonensis
Example: http://api.gbif.org/v1/species/match?verbose=False&strict=True&kingdom=Plantae&name=Vicia%20narbonensis%20L.%20subsp.%20narbonensis
@mdoering any idea why strict mode with kingdom=Plantae is lenient on the infraspecific notation (subsp. vs var.) in the examples above?
kingdom=Plantae
subsp.
var.
The following subspecies/variety plant names are all matched to the incorrect infraspecific rank (e.g. variety to subspecies or vice versa):
Example: http://api.gbif.org/v1/species/match?verbose=False&strict=True&kingdom=Plantae&name=Vicia%20narbonensis%20L.%20subsp.%20narbonensis