gbif / data-mobilization

For capturing and discussing potential datasets suitable for publishing to GBIF
Apache License 2.0
12 stars 2 forks source link

minimal data #332

Open gbif-portal opened 1 year ago

gbif-portal commented 1 year ago

minimal data

Region: china

Taxon: diversity of species

Comments: Table 1 Distribution of species and dominant families at different elevation gradients Elevation gradient(m) Family Genus Species Brachytheciacea Hypnaceae Thuidiaceae Ⅰ(970-1151) 5 10 14 4 1 2 Ⅱ(1152-1333) 6 11 16 8 2 2 Ⅲ(1334-1515) 8 13 21 9 5 2 Ⅳ(1516-1697) 7 12 20 4 3 2

Table 2 Vertical distribution of dominant bryophyte genera Elevation gradient(m) Brachythecium Eurhynchium Hypnum Plagiomnium Thuidium Anomodon Ⅰ(970-1151) 3 1 0 1 0 1 Ⅱ(1152-1333) 6 2 2 1 1 0 Ⅲ(1334-1515) 7 3 3 3 2 2 Ⅳ(1516-1697) 3 1 1 0 1 0

Table 3 Vertical distribution of dominant bryophyte species Elevation gradient(m) Eurohypnum leptothallum Brachythecium salebrosum Brachythecium pendulum Brachythecium amnicolum Hyophila involuta Entodon prorepens Brachythecium garovaglioides Thuidium delicatulum Brachythecium albicans Eurhynchium longirameum Ⅰ(970-1151) 33 0 6 5 14 0 5 0 0 10 Ⅱ(1152-1333) 14 1 15 0 7 2 8 0 5 0 Ⅲ(1334-1515) 17 21 1 12 0 5 0 12 0 1 Ⅳ(1516-1697) 4 2 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0

Table 4 Vertical distribution of dominant bryophyte species Elevation gradient(m) Wefts Turfs Pendants Mat Tail Ⅰ(970-1151) 74 13 3 0 0 Ⅱ(1152-1333) 79 11 0 0 0 Ⅲ(1334-1515) 79 3 1 6 1 Ⅳ(1516-1697) 63 27 0 0 0

Table 5 Patrick richness index of different altitude gradients Elevation gradient(m) Mean value Standard deviation Significant difference labeling

Ⅰ(970-1151) 22 1.20185 c Ⅱ(1152-1333) 25 0.33333 b Ⅲ(1334-1515) 33 1.1547 a Ⅳ(1516-1697) 29 0.88192 b

Table 6 Shannon-Wiener diversity index of different altitude gradients Elevation gradient(m) Mean value Standard deviation Significant difference labeling

Ⅰ(970-1151) 2.13 0.01155 c Ⅱ(1152-1333) 2.4 0.00882 a Ⅲ(1334-1515) 2.53 0.00577 b Ⅳ(1516-1697) 2.52 0.00577 a

Table 7 Pielou evenness index of different altitude gradients Elevation gradient(m) Mean value Standard deviation Significant difference labeling

Ⅰ(970-1151) 0.75 0.00577 c Ⅱ(1152-1333) 0.87 0.00577 a Ⅲ(1334-1515) 0.75 0.00577 c Ⅳ(1516-1697) 0.81 0.00577 b

Table 8 Simpson dominance index of different altitude gradients Elevation gradient(m) Mean value Standard deviation Significant difference labeling

Ⅰ(970-1151) 0.18 0.00577 a Ⅱ(1152-1333) 0.13 0.00577 d Ⅲ(1334-1515) 0.09 0.00577 b Ⅳ(1516-1697) 0.11 0.00577 c

CecSve commented 1 year ago

@thomasstjerne - did you submit this and should it remain in the repo?

timrobertson100 commented 1 year ago

Should "suggest a dataset" not include the logged-in user as it posts?

CecSve commented 1 year ago

Should "suggest a dataset" not include the logged-in user as it posts?

Yes, I believe so. I asked because Thomas assigned Tobias and I thought they might know why this issue was created. It was not registered through the form I think.