Checklist datasets

[CecSve]

Feedback for: https://docs.gbif-uat.org/freshwater-data-publishing-guide/en/#checklist-datasets

Checklist data are not specific to a location and do not represent individual observations.

This statement is not technically correct and should instead be phrased like this:

Checklist data are not necessarily specific to a location and do not always represent individual observations. However, they can be location specific (like the country-specific Global Register of Introduced and Invasive Species (GRIIS) checklists) and may contain occurrences (example).

Please also refer to the appropriate extension for checklist core datasets, such as the distribution extension and the species profile extension (look for keyword = dwc:Taxon for extensions that can be used with taxon core datasets).

@ManonGros you may have more input here

[ManonGros]

Generally, the guide is a bit dismissive of the checklists. I think that a lot of the information that is encouraged to be shared (for example the habitat for a given species/life stage) is actually something that could be shared in checklists rather than occurrences. In fact, I would argue that a lot of what we are missing is species information. Having a good comprehensive checklist of freshwater species would help make freshwater data more accessible to users. As mentioned above, the checklist extensions can be used to share a lot of species information.