Open timrobertson100 opened 2 years ago
From an email exchange with @qgroom
A sequence in ENA https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/FR997887 The same sequence in GBIF https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/3349789425 A sample in ENA https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/SAMEA7633093 This is not in GBIF, but note the much richer data in a sample
A sequence in ENA https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/FR997887 The same sequence in GBIF https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/3349789425
A sample in ENA https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/SAMEA7633093 This is not in GBIF, but note the much richer data in a sample
I notice we do have the museum record for the latter.
We should explore if GBIF could/should be using anything from the sample ENA. Storing sample_accession from the responses in dwc:materialSampleID may be part of the solution.
https://github.com/gbif/embl-adapter/issues/10#issuecomment-855825865
ManonGros
commented
2 years ago
From an email exchange with @qgroom
I notice we do have the museum record for the latter.
We should explore if GBIF could/should be using anything from the sample ENA. Storing sample_accession from the responses in dwc:materialSampleID may be part of the solution.