gbif-pipelines
commented
6 months ago Identifier validation still failing for the dataset Biología de la conservación de la guacamaya verde (Ara militaris) en el Sótano del Barro, Querétaro:
- Crawler attempt: 323
- Publishing organization: Comisión nacional para el conocimiento y uso de la biodiversidad
- Publishing country: MEXICO
- Installation: IPTCONABIO
- Number of occurrences indexed for this dataset at the time of the issue: 146
- Cause: GBIF ID problems exceed 50% threshold: 100% duplicates; 146 total records; 146 absent records
- Pipelines execution steps: http://api.gbif.org/v1/pipelines/history/execution/3741123/step
New IDs sample:
Old IDs sample:
06828562538a5695d6130836e83ff885
06b6a936cb516e17e0c5810c091e55d7
0c6089fe9db5db68edacbd67c248fe03
0eae66f8f7daa252ab79a926b4f827b4
1e7cd4c45ed7e4a7f031dfd80f96b484
3d2ce25474bbe21057cb6bca251118f1
42c6c2529d9506717d8f75b801d0df44
49bdaa519f6e618ead9f7898f2cb4d7d
5559c65aa26e66d4ce9bf2c8ce673f51
59d816c464c678c63769502321693811Publisher email
Hello, I am contacting you from the GBIF Secretariat about a dataset published by the [Biología de la conservación de la guacamaya verde (Ara militaris) en el Sótano del Barro, Querétaro](https://registry.gbif.org/dataset/a1f64ea8-7e60-4542-aa6e-7baa09be0d69) : https://doi.org/10.15468/mdi42u. We noticed that the occurrenceIDs were changed. We have temporarily paused the ingestions of this dataset. As you might already know, when an occurrence record has a new occurrenceID for a given dataset, our system considers it to be a new occurrence. This means that it will be given a new gbifid and a new occurrence URL (like this one: https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/1252968762) and the old gbifid and URL will be deprecated. In this case, this means that the occurrence URLs would be deprecated when ingesting the newest versions of these datasets. We would like to check with you if those changes were intentional. Do you know if this is the case? Please let us know, thanks! We are happy to resume the dataset ingestion. Note that some users rely on those occurrence URLs and gbifids (like https://bionomia.net for example). In an attempt to improve the stability of the occurrence URLs and gbifids, we have implemented a warning system to detect these type of changes in datasets (see this news item). If the data publisher can provide us with a list of old and new occurrenceIDs per record, we can avoid the identifier and URL changes. Could that be an option? Please let us know if you have any question. Thanks! All the best,You can skip/fix identifier validation using the registry UI.
Identifier validation failed for the dataset Biología de la conservación de la guacamaya verde (Ara militaris) en el Sótano del Barro, Querétaro:
Publisher email
Hello, I am contacting you from the GBIF Secretariat about a dataset published by the [Biología de la conservación de la guacamaya verde (Ara militaris) en el Sótano del Barro, Querétaro](https://registry.gbif.org/dataset/a1f64ea8-7e60-4542-aa6e-7baa09be0d69) : https://doi.org/10.15468/mdi42u. We noticed that the occurrenceIDs were changed. We have temporarily paused the ingestions of this dataset. As you might already know, when an occurrence record has a new occurrenceID for a given dataset, our system considers it to be a new occurrence. This means that it will be given a new gbifid and a new occurrence URL (like this one: https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/1252968762) and the old gbifid and URL will be deprecated. In this case, this means that the occurrence URLs would be deprecated when ingesting the newest versions of these datasets. We would like to check with you if those changes were intentional. Do you know if this is the case? Please let us know, thanks! We are happy to resume the dataset ingestion. Note that some users rely on those occurrence URLs and gbifids (like https://bionomia.net for example). In an attempt to improve the stability of the occurrence URLs and gbifids, we have implemented a warning system to detect these type of changes in datasets (see this news item). If the data publisher can provide us with a list of old and new occurrenceIDs per record, we can avoid the identifier and URL changes. Could that be an option? Please let us know if you have any question. Thanks! All the best,You can skip/fix identifier validation using the registry UI.