gbif-pipelines
commented
2 months ago Identifier validation still failing for the dataset Herbário CPAP da Embrapa Pantanal:
- Crawler attempt: 453
- Publishing organization: Embrapa Pantanal
- Publishing country: BRAZIL
- Installation: speciesLink Network / INCT-HVFF IPT
- Number of occurrences indexed for this dataset at the time of the issue: 24824
- Cause: GBIF ID problems exceed 50% threshold: 100% duplicates; 24824 total records; 24824 absent records
- Pipelines execution steps: http://api.gbif.org/v1/pipelines/history/execution/4154592/step
New IDs sample:
Old IDs sample:
BRA:CPAP:CPAP:7861
BRA:CPAP:CPAP:25713
BRA:CPAP:CPAP:25258
BRA:CPAP:CPAP:25259
BRA:CPAP:CPAP:25260
BRA:CPAP:CPAP:25261
BRA:CPAP:CPAP:25262
BRA:CPAP:CPAP:25263
BRA:CPAP:CPAP:25264
BRA:CPAP:CPAP:25265Publisher email
Hello, I am contacting you from the GBIF Secretariat about a dataset published by the [Herbário CPAP da Embrapa Pantanal](https://registry.gbif.org/dataset/f9e1895f-4f52-45e7-aa4f-4dea366b7d2d) : https://doi.org/10.15468/wdmnid. We noticed that the occurrenceIDs were changed. We have temporarily paused the ingestions of this dataset. As you might already know, when an occurrence record has a new occurrenceID for a given dataset, our system considers it to be a new occurrence. This means that it will be given a new gbifid and a new occurrence URL (like this one: https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/1252968762) and the old gbifid and URL will be deprecated. In this case, this means that the occurrence URLs would be deprecated when ingesting the newest versions of these datasets. We would like to check with you if those changes were intentional. Do you know if this is the case? Please let us know, thanks! We are happy to resume the dataset ingestion. Note that some users rely on those occurrence URLs and gbifids (like https://bionomia.net for example). In an attempt to improve the stability of the occurrence URLs and gbifids, we have implemented a warning system to detect these type of changes in datasets (see this news item). If the data publisher can provide us with a list of old and new occurrenceIDs per record, we can avoid the identifier and URL changes. Could that be an option? Please let us know if you have any question. Thanks! All the best,You can skip/fix identifier validation using the registry UI.
Identifier validation failed for the dataset CPAP - Herbário CPAP:
Publisher email
Hello, I am contacting you from the GBIF Secretariat about a dataset published by the [CPAP - Herbário CPAP](https://registry.gbif.org/dataset/f9e1895f-4f52-45e7-aa4f-4dea366b7d2d) : https://doi.org/10.15468/wdmnid. We noticed that the occurrenceIDs were changed. We have temporarily paused the ingestions of this dataset. As you might already know, when an occurrence record has a new occurrenceID for a given dataset, our system considers it to be a new occurrence. This means that it will be given a new gbifid and a new occurrence URL (like this one: https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/1252968762) and the old gbifid and URL will be deprecated. In this case, this means that the occurrence URLs would be deprecated when ingesting the newest versions of these datasets. We would like to check with you if those changes were intentional. Do you know if this is the case? Please let us know, thanks! We are happy to resume the dataset ingestion. Note that some users rely on those occurrence URLs and gbifids (like https://bionomia.net for example). In an attempt to improve the stability of the occurrence URLs and gbifids, we have implemented a warning system to detect these type of changes in datasets (see this news item). If the data publisher can provide us with a list of old and new occurrenceIDs per record, we can avoid the identifier and URL changes. Could that be an option? Please let us know if you have any question. Thanks! All the best,You can skip/fix identifier validation using the registry UI.