I'd like to see an approximate running ratio of occurrence records to specimen records. Perhaps updated monthly.
User provided contact info: morris.bob@gmail.com
System: Chrome 65.0.3325 / Linux 0.0.0
User: See in registry
Referer: https://www.gbif.org/user/profile
Window size: width 1920 - height 1006
API log&_a=(columns:!(_source),index:'prod-varnish-',interval:auto,query:(query_string:(analyze_wildcard:!t,query:'response:%3E499')),sort:!('@timestamp',desc)))
Site log&_a=(columns:!(_source),index:'prod-portal-',interval:auto,query:(query_string:(analyze_wildcard:!t,query:'response:%3E499')),sort:!('@timestamp',desc)))
System health at time of feedback: CRITICAL
An approximation would be to add a first indexed date to the occ index. That would be a crude estimation of the past. Else it should use snapshots to do so.
fraction of specimen records
I'd like to see an approximate running ratio of occurrence records to specimen records. Perhaps updated monthly.
User provided contact info: morris.bob@gmail.com System: Chrome 65.0.3325 / Linux 0.0.0 User: See in registry Referer: https://www.gbif.org/user/profile Window size: width 1920 - height 1006 API log&_a=(columns:!(_source),index:'prod-varnish-',interval:auto,query:(query_string:(analyze_wildcard:!t,query:'response:%3E499')),sort:!('@timestamp',desc))) Site log&_a=(columns:!(_source),index:'prod-portal-',interval:auto,query:(query_string:(analyze_wildcard:!t,query:'response:%3E499')),sort:!('@timestamp',desc))) System health at time of feedback: CRITICAL