gbif / portal-feedback

User feedback for the GBIF API, website and published data. You can ask questions here. 🗨❓
30 stars 16 forks source link

gallery: image categories #2201

Open gbif-portal opened 5 years ago

gbif-portal commented 5 years ago

gallery: image categories

As gallery is one of the popular features, it may benefit from separating images of the species taken in nature, separately from the preserved specimens, separately from the label images


User: See in registry System: Chrome 76.0.3809 / Windows 10.0.0 Referer: https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?dataset_key=3412de46-ed80-42c1-9e7b-42a1e040e66e Window size: width 2133 - height 1185 API log&_a=(columns:!(_source),index:'prod-varnish-',interval:auto,query:(query_string:(analyze_wildcard:!t,query:'response:%3E499')),sort:!('@timestamp',desc))) Site log&_a=(columns:!(_source),index:'prod-portal-',interval:auto,query:(query_string:(analyze_wildcard:!t,query:'response:%3E499')),sort:!('@timestamp',desc))) System health at time of feedback: CRITICAL

MattBlissett commented 5 years ago

This is something that requires us to store (or at minimum download every time we need it) every image. It's possible, and something we've investigated.

dschigel commented 5 years ago

Or a change in the extension / standard? Three fields instead of one, still calling images form outside?

MattBlissett commented 5 years ago

Appropriate terms already exist in Audubon Core (almost no-one is using them, but we're not doing anything with them either).

We could automatically complete them with machine learning, or leave the original values if they're present.