Open gbif-portal opened 3 years ago
The data is mapped correctly but many rows are empty with no measurement. I supposed this is an artefact of the way the original file was generated.
But shouldn't it be removed since there is no information? Or perhaps we should remove it during interpretation since it is just noise? We can also just leave it, but it just feels nonsense data. Or have I missed how this brings value?
This seems like a problem that should be handled by interpretation. I don't think that we can enforce that all publishers remove NULL measurements or facts.
I suport the Idea of handling the problem during interpetration, most publishers find it dificult to manage diferent tables for occurrences and measurments and even more if this requieres having different number or rows.
wrong data mapping?
The ExtendedMeasurementOrFact seem to be wrongly mapped at the source? https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/2982146336/fragment
There isn't really any information in it
Github user: @MortenHofft User: See in registry System: Chrome 87.0.4280 / Mac OS X 10.15.7 Referer: https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/2982146336 Window size: width 1440 - height 766 API log&_a=(columns:!(_source),index:'prod-varnish-',interval:auto,query:(query_string:(analyze_wildcard:!t,query:'response:%3E499')),sort:!('@timestamp',desc))) Site log&_a=(columns:!(_source),index:'prod-portal-',interval:auto,query:(query_string:(analyze_wildcard:!t,query:'response:%3E499')),sort:!('@timestamp',desc))) System health at time of feedback: WARNING datasetKey: 243bb217-84a5-43d5-adca-af481ab6ab8f publishingOrgKey: f7f9717e-9e50-4a00-a30f-7b134390a566