search

gbif / portal-feedback

User feedback for the GBIF API, website and published data. You can ask questions here. 🗨❓
30 stars 16 forks source link

genericName wrongly interpreted for higher ranks e.g Foraminifera #3961

Open gbif-portal opened 2 years ago

gbif-portal commented 2 years ago

genericName wrongly interpreted for higher ranks e.g Foraminifera

User: See in registry System: Safari 15.1.0 / Mac OS X 10.15.7 Referer: https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/1061190602 Window size: width 1466 - height 964 API log&_a=(columns:!(_source),filters:!(),index:'3390a910-fcda-11ea-a9ab-4375f2a9d11c',interval:auto,query:(language:kuery,query:''),sort:!())) Site log&_a=(columns:!(_source),filters:!(),index:'5c73f360-fce3-11ea-a9ab-4375f2a9d11c',interval:auto,query:(language:kuery,query:''),sort:!())) System health at time of feedback: OPERATIONAL datasetKey: 58d0f326-2e85-4d0a-a744-571461220f00 publishingOrgKey: 0dc9c7a0-b5c6-11d9-a0b8-b8a03c50a862 Network keys: 99d66b6c-9087-452f-a9d4-f15f2c2d0e7e Node handles: @albenson-usgs

ManonGros commented 2 years ago

I don't think this is a data content issue, I think this is an interpretation issue. The generic name refers to the first part of a binomial name of the species and shouldn't be inferred for higher rank names like Foraminifera (which is a phylum).

Screenshot 2022-04-26 at 15 03 27

It should be left blank instead.