Open ManonGros opened 9 months ago
My short answer is yes, and this seems to overlap with discussions we have had regarding better use of checklists for filtering and other purposes e.g. with regard to invasive species lists, national species lists etc. With regard to CITES I believe the data sources for Species+ may be most relevant - https://speciesplus.net/ . It is managed by UNEP WCMC with whom we are also working with regard to the Protected Planet data, and I have discussed potential collaboration on this which we could resume if it seems useful @andrewrodrigues
We used to show it on all species pages (if there was any data), @thomasstjerne probably remember the details. I can see it is broken currently. That happens regularly. They change endpoints, block us for making too many requests etc. So having the data as a checklist would help for the species pages. And is a requirement for search.
There is a related issue here: https://github.com/gbif/portal16/issues/1879
We think having CITES species as a filter can be really useful from a policy relevant perspective.
Additionally, having GRIIS checklists to make filters for invasive species in the GBIF portal would be great and is a feature that our publishers and data users have requested. In theory you can do something similar with the establishment_means filter and selecting "introduced", but it only works for datasets were you put that information and not all invasive species
So something like a UICN option where you choose the kind of invasive species for everything would be great!
There seem to be an interest in accessing CITES information on GBIF: https://discourse.gbif.org/t/ways-to-find-checklist-datasets-with-appendixcites-values-in-a-species-distribution-extension/4203. I imagine, ideally users should be able to search species and occurrences based on the CITES info.
As far as I can tell, and talking with @andrewrodrigues, we don't have a proper CITES dataset (like we do for the IUCN). The first step would be to make the data available on GBIF.
A related question, more generic question is: if we start openign up policy relevant checklists to facilitate user access, do we need ot think about how that would be displayed on the species pages in GBIF?