Closed gbif-portal closed 2 months ago
Sorry, I was meaning that the specie was identified as Tmetonyx similis instead of T. cicada
@leilabrunner I looked at the iNaturalist conversation, but I'm still a bit confused about how this should resolve. I see both iNaturalist and GBIF assign this to Tmetonyx similis (G.O.Sars, 1891)
. If that's correct, can we close this issue?
FYI, iNaturalist record updates are only pushed to GBIF on a weekly basis, so sometimes it takes a a few days to show up in GBIF.
I see that it has been indeed updated, we can close the issue !
Thanks! @CecSve can you please close this when you have a moment?
The specimen was re-identified as Cicada similis (with the help of new pictures) :
https://inaturalist.ca/observations/183825729
User: See in registry - Send email System: Chrome 123.0.0 / Mac OS X 10.15.7 Referer: https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/4535871892 Window size: width 1440 - height 779 API log&_a=(columns:!(_source),filters:!(),index:'3390a910-fcda-11ea-a9ab-4375f2a9d11c',interval:auto,query:(language:kuery,query:''),sort:!())) Site log&_a=(columns:!(_source),filters:!(),index:'5c73f360-fce3-11ea-a9ab-4375f2a9d11c',interval:auto,query:(language:kuery,query:''),sort:!())) System health at time of feedback: OPERATIONAL datasetKey: 50c9509d-22c7-4a22-a47d-8c48425ef4a7 publishingOrgKey: 28eb1a3f-1c15-4a95-931a-4af90ecb574d
Node handles: @sformel-usgs