Open ManonGros opened 3 years ago
I think I have finished this vocabulary. @timrobertson100 and perhaps @MattBlissett, could you take a look and let me know if this seems ok to you?
This looks like a vocabulary for GBIF Region (a classification for GBIF's use in organizing activities) rather than continent (seven-continent geographical definition, including several countries like RU, KZ, TR with land on two continents).
The concept label_en for EUROPE and SOUTH AMERICA should be Europe and South America.
Central America and the Caribbean are part of the North American continent by all definitions I'm aware of.
@Matthew Blissett @.***> Are you sure you don't mean that Central America and the Caribbean are part of North America? I have never seen the grouping you suggest.
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 10:58 AM Matt Blissett @.***> wrote:
This looks like a vocabulary for GBIF Region (a classification for GBIF's use in organizing activities) rather than continent (seven-continent geographical definition, including several countries like RU, KZ, TR with land on two continents).
The concept label_en for EUROPE and SOUTH AMERICA should be Europe and South America.
Central America and the Caribbean are part of the South American continent.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/gbif/vocabulary/issues/72#issuecomment-821196367, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADQ7266ZZG4DMDA3HE2G3DTJA663ANCNFSM4ZLH6VXA .
Yes, thanks, I mean Central America and the Caribbean are part of North America. (Comment above edited.)
The vocabulary spreadsheet as it is at the moment has them as part of "South America / Latin America and the Caribbean".
Thanks for checking! you are right, I used the GBIF regions because I didn't think. I will correct that.
Ok I updated the names and the mapping. Could I ask you to check again? Thanks!
NA
could be North America, but could also be "Not applicable" (or Namibia), is that why you excluded that one?
It seems fine now, thanks.
yes it is why I excluded it. I thought it was too ambiguous.
Good choice.
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 7:56 AM Marie Grosjean @.***> wrote:
yes it is why I excluded it. I thought it was too ambiguous.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/gbif/vocabulary/issues/72#issuecomment-822377486, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADQ722Y2L2XP2SNZWSM6FLTJQD6PANCNFSM4ZLH6VXA .
I've changed:
It's now ready to import.
Thank you! I will import it to the server.
Here is a file to edit: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1BMSJ5-hd0b8MXx-p-rQe9CIbQEa9dZHC/view?usp=sharing
It contains:
Pease check instructions here: https://github.com/gbif/vocabulary/issues/70