This is a bit of a speculative PR that relates to, but doesn't completely solve, #18
I spent a bit of time producing my own multi-architecture images for this project and ended up using this Dockerfile in place of the original one. Wondered if you'd consider accepting it upstream since it's also a fair bit simpler/smaller than the existing one.
The existing docker image cannot easily be built for multi-arch using docker buildx or similar since it encodes the Rust target architecture using the ARCH build-arg. docker buildx provides the target architecture using the TARGETARCH build-arg but uses amd64 and arm64 compared to Rust using x86_64 and aarch64. To make this easier I've changed the builder image to the Alpine based version so that --target is not required to produce a static musl-based binary (since it's the default on Alpine).
This is a bit of a speculative PR that relates to, but doesn't completely solve, #18 I spent a bit of time producing my own multi-architecture images for this project and ended up using this
Dockerfilein place of the original one. Wondered if you'd consider accepting it upstream since it's also a fair bit simpler/smaller than the existing one.The existing docker image cannot easily be built for multi-arch using
docker buildxor similar since it encodes the Rust target architecture using theARCHbuild-arg.docker buildxprovides the target architecture using theTARGETARCHbuild-arg but usesamd64andarm64compared to Rust usingx86_64andaarch64. To make this easier I've changed the builder image to the Alpine based version so that--targetis not required to produce a static musl-based binary (since it's the default on Alpine).