Open gbuehler opened 3 years ago
It is possible that the URI class should be in ISO 19103 as it has been identified in Annex C.3.1 ALTERNATIVELY Change XSD (.../19115/-1/mcc//commonClasses.xsd):
TO:
It is possible that the URI class should be in ISO 19103 as it has been identified in Annex C.3.1 ALTERNATIVELY Change XSD (.../19115/-1/mcc//commonClasses.xsd):
TO:
This could be amended as part of the ISO 19115-3 Review with addition of gcx:URI of type="anyURI" OR the current gcx: could be expanded to include gcx:URI_PropertyType and gcx:URI of type="anyURI" [2020-10-31 04:22:19] by Evert Bleys
Or perhaps 19115-1 should use the 19103 class URI (an HMMG call?)
That class should then have an agreed XML encoding of xs:anyURI (an XMG call?)
The open question of where to put the XML encoding of 19103 (effectively, a managed list of places where we use ISO 19139-1 clause 7.3.8, the /req/external/ group
(Peter Parslow) [2020-11-04 17:07:08] by ISO/TC 211 Admin
Geographic information -- Metadata -- Part 1: Fundamentals
Justification:
Submitted: 2020-10-31 03:43:31 by ejbleys@gmail.com